A friend said, he would never forget the sight of the alien looking TR-3B based at Papoose. The pitch black, triangular shaped TR-3B was rarely mentioned–and then, only in hushed whispers–at the Groom Lake facility where he worked. The craft had flown over the Groom Lake runway in complete silence and magically stopped above Area S-4. It hovered silently in the same position, for some 10 minutes, before gently settling vertically to the tarmac. At times a corona of silver blue light glowed around the circumference of the massive TR-3B. The operational model is 600 feet across.

Ok, admittedly the physics discussed in the video above is just speculation, speculation based on “Known” physics, primarily inside the box.

Could it be something more exotic? of course, something far more refined than mercury vapor at hundreds of thousands of atmospheres of pressure spinning at ridiculous speeds? yes.

Something like harnessing energy from the vacuum, complete localized control of gravity and intertia?

The bigger question is how could they keep this a secret for so long? for some answers and compelling thought on this question see the video below which discusses UFO’s and the national security state, how extensively important the deepest parts of the government consider this technology and the UFO issue to be despite their continued denial of being interested  or having any knowledge at all, all the while having perfected gravity control since 1955 or 56.

NOTE: In 1965 the NSA had Computers with a clock speed of 650mhz, computer technology of that level was not available commercially until 2000, 35yrs later!

NOTE: Some key aspects of Maxwell’s Equations were wrong! Video Below

If this is true as it seems to be, a good deal of the physics people use to discredit the possibility of these technologies may be rendered invalid!

This is Richard Dolan Speaking on the U.S. Government’s Secret Space Program and mentions specifically the craft in this article

The TR-3B is Code named Astra. The tactical reconnaissance TR-3B first operational flight was in the early 90s. The triangular shaped nuclear powered aerospace platform was developed under the Top Secret, Aurora Program with SDI and black budget monies. At least 3 of the billion dollar plus TR-3Bs were flying by 1994. The Aurora is the most classified aerospace development program in existence. The TR-3B is the most exotic vehicle created by the Aurora Program. It is funded and operationally tasked by the National Reconnaissance Office, the NSA, and the CIA. The TR-3B flying triangle is not fiction and was built with technology available in the mid 80s. Not every UFO spotted is one of theirs.

This Video goes the operational details accessed from many sources, although the ARV (alien reproduction vehicle) is the main subject of this video it is also most likely highly relative to the TR-3B.

The TR-3B vehicles outer coating is reactive to electrical Radar stimulation and can change reflectiveness, radar absorptiveness, and color. This polymer skin, when used in conjunction with the TR-3Bs Electronic Counter Measures and, ECCM, can make the vehicle look like a small aircraft, or a flying cylinder–or even trick radar receivers into falsely detecting a variety of aircraft, no aircraft, or several aircraft at various locations. A circular, plasma filled accelerator ring called the Magnetic Field Disrupter, surrounds the rotatable crew compartment and is far ahead of any imaginable technology.

Sandia and Livermore laboratories developed the reverse engineered MFD technology. The government will go to any lengths to protect this technology. The plasma, mercury based, is pressurized at 250,000 atmospheres at a temperature of 150 degrees Kelvin and accelerated to 50,000 rpm to create a super-conductive plasma with the resulting gravity disruption. The MFD generates a magnetic vortex field, which disrupts or neutralizes the effects of gravity on mass within proximity, by 89 percent.

Do not misunderstand. This is not antigravity. Anti-gravity provides a repulsive force that can be used for propulsion. The MFD creates a disruption of the Earth’s gravitational field upon the mass within the circular accelerator. The mass of the circular accelerator and all mass within the accelerator, such as the crew capsule, avionics, MFD systems, fuels, crew environmental systems, and the nuclear reactor, are reduced by 89%. This causes the effect of making the vehicle extremely light and able to outperform and outmaneuver any craft yet constructed–except, of course, those UFOs we did not build.

The TR-3B is a high altitude, stealth, reconnaissance platform with an indefinite loiter time. Once you get it up there at speed, it doesnt take much propulsion to maintain altitude. At Groom Lake their have been whispered rumours of a new element that acts as a catalyst to the plasma. With the vehicle mass reduced by 89%, the craft can travel at Mach 9, vertically or horizontally. My sources say the performance is limited only the stresses that the human pilots can endure. Which is a lot, really, considering along with the 89% reduction in mass, the G forces are also reduced by 89%.

The TR-3Bs propulsion is provided by 3 multimode thrusters mounted at each bottom corner of the triangular platform. The TR-3 is a sub-Mach 9 vehicle until it reaches altitudes above l20,000 feet–then God knows how fast it can go! The 3 multimode rocket engines mounted under each corner of the craft use hydrogen or methane and oxygen as a propellent.

In a liquid oxygen/hydrogen rocket system, 85% of the propellent mass is oxygen. The nuclear thermal rocket engine uses a hydrogen propellent, augmented with oxygen for additional thrust. The reactor heats the liquid hydrogen and injects liquid oxygen in the supersonic nozzle, so that the hydrogen burns concurrently in the liquid oxygen afterburner. The multimode propulsion system can; operate in the atmosphere, with thrust provided by the nuclear reactor, in the upper atmosphere, with hydrogen propulsion, and in orbit, with the combined hydrogen\ oxygen propulsion.

What you have to remember is, that the 3 rocket engines only have to propel 11 percent of the mass of the Top Secret TR-3B. The engines are reportedly built by Rockwell. Many sightings of triangular UFOs are not alien vehicles but the top secret TR-3B. The NSA, NRO, CIA, and USAF have been playing a shell game with aircraft nomenclature – creating the TR-3, modified to the TR-3A, the TR-3B, and the Teir 2, 3, and 4, with suffixes like Plus or Minus added on to confuse further the fact that each of these designators is a different aircraft and not the same aerospace vehicle. A TR-3B is as different from a TR-3A as a banana is from a grape. Some of these vehicles are manned and others are unmanned.

205 comments to TR-3B

  • phillip

    Nuclear powered and uses mercury in the plasma generation?This sounds like the nazi bell project hitler had his scientists working on.Also reminds me of the kecksburg incident.

  • trappedinla.

    Husband and son saw this thing near barksdale AFB in Louisiana in august of this year.

    • bubba

      I also saw this thing near/north of Barksdale AFB back in the mid 90’s. I quit telling about it because no one believed me. Called it a UFO until finding this link a few months ago … what a relief. The three lights were not on when I saw it hovering over Caddo Lake off Hwy 1 near Oil City, La. Actually a calm came over me instead of fear which seemed curious to me later. It was huge, the outline glowed simular to dim neon. WOW

      • Caddo Lake huh? I’m from Houston and was at a friend’s house in Dickinson, Tx about two and a half years ago and we saw something similar hovering above us and then once we both kind of came out of our silent stupor and said to each other “what the hell is that?”, it was almost like it new it had been spotted, started to move away, slowly at first, and then it seemed to immediately be just moving faster than any aircraft I’ve ever seen. It then changed course at ALMOST (not directly) toward Ellington Air Force Base. The only difference was that it did not have the three lights at the corners, but five in the (rear?) end. They also were not in a row but rather in an order like a row of migrating birds. Does this seem related to what you saw?

    • Him

      Saw three of them Accrington uk end of last year

  • mystery solved 16 yrs later

    I have wondered for 16 years what the craft was i saw in 97. We pulled off the side of a low travel country road and watched it for a few minutes in total awe, confusion and fear by what we saw silently hovering over an open field to the side of us. I have for years tried to figure it out but nothing ever looked or acted right till now. I was with 2 others when we saw it. Thank you for this post. It was in Michigan about an hour from Selfridge air base in the country where we saw it.

    • Witness

      That's interesting that you say this, for I saw the same thing fly over my head in 1997 but I was living in Denver, had three bright lights and as it slowly flew towards us I finally comprehended that this was a massive object gliding against the night sky silently… I had an idea of what I saw when years ago Popular Mechanic's had on it's cover the "Aurora"

    • Mike

      I also saw it in Michigan. It was just a few minutes from Selfridge air base. It flew over Warren, Detroit. The path it traveled was Van Dyke ave. Very public at 7pm January 2010.

  • Recently Awoken

    I live just outside of DC. A few days after 9/11 with no other lights in the sky I witnessed 3 lights flying overhead in a triangular pattern. They were high enough for me to think they were recon planes or satellites. But, the longer I thought about it and looked at them, I was sure that it was a single object. I ran inside… I've never been so fearful and I've only told my wife until I read this article.

  • QuestJester

    It's a hot pocket put into orbit by sewer gas and, a spark and lighter fluid.

  • Geoff

    I don't see how the G-forces that the occupants are subjected to are reduced with the mass reduction. They should pertain to acceleration, not the mass of the craft. Please explain.

    • Michael

      Force = Mass X acceleration? Messing with any parts of this equation (changing the effective mass), would decrease relative behavior of this equation. My thoughts anyway. Gravity is a type of force with a value of 9.8 m/sec squared.

      • Not to be too picky, but it’s 9.8 meters per second per second not 9.8 meters/second squared. The equation you described would be (9.8 meters divided 1 second) squared. Sorry but iPhones don’t have a division symbol only a forward slash and I wanted to be as speciphic as I could (layman’s terms is a better way of putting it to point out your mistake. Good observation by the way thou! I also noticed the same mistake in the article. Even if you reduce the mass of the craft, the pilot’s is the same and he/she (it?) would still be subject to normal g-forces unless they were canceled out by an on inboard false gravity source right? Or not, I’m just an ignorant high school dropout so I couldn’t possibly know what I’m talking about. Any thoughts?

        • kb001

          if your going to try to be a picky teacher make sure you know what the hell your taking about, or rather what the hell your teaching. I hate it when people try and look smart by pointing out someones mistake or lack of knowledge, especially on a topic that has no true value to the conversation as a whole, and whats even worse is when they prove that they are the ones who are the uneducated and ignorant of what they are speaking. So, let an actual teacher do the teaching, so pay attention:
          Every planetary body (including the Earth) is surrounded by its own gravitational field, which exerts an attractive force on all objects. Assuming a spherically symmetrical planet, the strength of this field at any given point is proportional to the planetary body's mass and inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the center of the body.

          The strength of the gravitational field is numerically equal to the acceleration of objects under its influence, and its value at the Earth's surface, denoted g, is expressed below as the standard average. According to the Bureau International de Poids et Mesures, International Systems of Units (SI), the Earth's standard acceleration due to gravity is:

          g = 9.80665 m/s2 = 32.1740 ft/s2) that means meter/sec/sec, or m/s/s, or meter per second squared.
          Here is a tip if your going to try play teaching, then do your homework, at least goggle what you are going to talk about, it real easy…you go to a web site with a big word in the middle of the page, that word is GOGGLE you then…….sorry I was taking it to far…. it really pisses me of when people pass off wrong info as if its correct,,,,,, take it light all…. KB

          • That Guy

            “You’re”…”google”….glad you weren’t my teacher

          • Grinch

            Glad you’re not my teacher. Kinda sarcastic and full of yourself aren’t you? If you are a teacher try and be a little more professional .

          • dogboy

            You're a teacher who knows how to google. The same response is available on Wikipedia. Do you teach your students to copy and paste also?

        • Andy

          From what I understand, the craft is in some kind of bubble, electromagnetic force field which apparently negates gravity to a point. These remarks are from studies I have done regarding this kind of craft. But I also have learned that the E.T.'s from 1947 (supposedly) had been engineered for high velocities, hence their strange physical appearance. Only time will tell.

      • BarerMender

        Disrupting the gravitational field wouldn't change the mass. You're thinking of weight. Mass doesn't depend on gravity.

    • Scott

      The MFD generates a magnetic vortex field, which disrupts or neutralizes the effects of gravity on mass within proximity, by 89 percent. Do not misunderstand. This is not antigravity. Anti-gravity provides a repulsive force that can be used for propulsion. The MFD creates a disruption of the Earth’s gravitational field upon the mass within the circular accelerator. The mass of the circular accelerator and all mass within the accelerator, such as the crew capsule, avionics, MFD systems, fuels, crew environmental systems, and the nuclear reactor, are reduced by 89%.

      Note "crew capsule". The MFD generates a field around the entire aircraft affecting everything within that field that has mass, including the crew.

    • Josh

      Anything that has mass creates gravity and is effected by gravity. The more mass present the stronger the gravitational pull for example the Earth vs Jupiter.

    • TWolf

      If your mass is less the mass inertia is less, the energy or mass inertia of a moving mass is E= 1/2M X V2, that is how it works.

    • Scuttsie

      You are right Geoff. G-forces would not be reduced. Think of an extremely light flying insect hitting the windshield of a car travelling at 80 kph. The bug has very little mass but you know the old joke … what's the last thing that goes through a bug's mind when it hits the windscreen? its arse! This whole article in my opinion is BS. Is it April 1? What would be the effect of this field upon human DNA? You go in as a man … you come out a duck! Paul Scutts.

      • If however this was derived from “alien” technology it would be the height of arrogance to assume that if WE couldn’t do it THEY couldn’t do it either!….. in 1965 the NSA had a computer that operated at 650mhz, the commercial market didn’t reach that level of performance until 2000, 35yrs later!.
        So, just imagine an off planet race who are hundreds of thousands of years ahead of us in technological research and innovation…. Gravity controlled craft?..sure why not… technology that can mitigate or totally eliminate inertia?..why not
        We are Sooo far from figuring out everything it’s stunning, almost sad how close we still are to the starting line.

  • Henrik

    My sons and I actually saw 2 of these in Plainfield, Illinois off of rte 59/127th street hovering over 2 separate cornfields in September 2012 at approximately 11pm. Silent, black and hovering a few hundred feet off the ground. No idea which "model" they were. We were within 1/4 mile of 1 and a few miles away from the second one.

  • T.G.

    My sister said she saw something in the shape of an acorn hovering directly over her head at 200' for about 5 minutes one twilight evening back in 1966. But, could this be the same kind of craft as the TR-3B, since it its development was more recent?

  • Bill

    1993, I had a giant, silent, black triangle fly directly over me, prob at an altitude of about 1000ft, it was low. I'm 1 hour west of philly, the triangle was flying slowly in a SE direction. It was at least the size of 2 football fields, easily the largest thing I have ever seen in the sky. This article gives the best explanation I have seen yet, but even if this was a man made craft it scared and still scares the hell out of me. It almost like your brain can't comprehend what you are looking at it's so surreal.

    • JesusHelpUs

      I saw a black-brown triangular trapezoidal UFO. I think it was around 1986. It was silent, and very very large. Pretty sure these are ET spacecraft. This site is the best I have been to in regards to people replying as witnesses. There are so many witnesses and at so many different locations and times. Doesn’t seem to be a rare thing to spot these dark triangle UFOs. Nice to see more people are comfortable with sharing these experiences. Its about time the general public and governments started to take these things more seriously, instead of scoffing at people.

  • Jorge

    Sure does not look and sound like alien back engineering to me,rather advanced but crude technology. So if we have that supposedly why are we still using conventional Rockets to go to Mars or the Moon? Why are we still building F35's?
    Something does not add up. I also think that the first to get that Technology would be Israel,Americas kissing Cousin.

    • GetReal

      Why are we / they still building the F-35? Ever heard of the American Military Complex? It has to feed itself. They also engineer $5000 toilette seats… Snap out of it!!!!

      • Ohio guy

        Also because they cost so much to build, and/or will be kept secret until needed to be used publicly, similar to the stealth technology fighters and bombers were kept under wraps for years until they started using them in wars?

    • Saiful Rimkeit

      My personal take on that is because “they” have created at least 3 existence paradigms. One for “them” and one for us. The mid paradigm involves some of the greater Planet corporations and banks. They, the royals and elite, have learned to protect themselves over the millenia, so there is one reality for usns and another for “them” with the profit makers in between. The less they deal and expose themselves to us, the better they are off. The deeper one studies their existence paradigm, the more it sounds and reads stranger than fiction. So, the deal is that they have their toys and we have ours. We get the ones which are less economic to run. Since they control the corporations, why not sell us gasoline, gas, diesel and battery driven run vehicles of all kinds and make a double profit on that technology? Some of it is tied to scaled economics. Who could afford to fly in the craft posted here? So we get avgas instead. See the simple alternative for a vehicle here: But if we had the water powered car, they would make less profit — so certain technologies get squashed. After all,”they” don’t want us to be too independent. Is that power plant scalable? If so, imagine using large energy producing plants that run on water to light up all cities. But then, some environmentalist would sue to stop the “vapor producing” power plants.
      GetReal has a very realistic and great explanation of our dilemma. They always like to use methods on us that will increase their wealth by selling product and peripherals and with what runs the product. Same with creating exotic machines such as the one mentioned in this blog. We get to use the F-18s and F-35s and they use the Auroras. That’s just part of the story.

  • Math101

    Reading this wasquite interesting, and got me thinking… so I did some calculations. 250,000 atmospheres would calculate out to roughly 3,675,000 psi (More that any known pressure vessel can hold, and about 50 times the tensile strength of all knowen materials except carbon nanotubes). The ring in this craft would contain 9,700,000 cubic feet of mercury vapor, and at that pressure would be at a density of 845 lbs/ft^3 (13.5g/cm^3). That calculates out to 8,200,000,000 lbs of vapor alone (2000 times the annual mining production rate, i.e. 2000 years worth of mining), plus the craft itself. Even after reducing the weight of this vehicle by 89%, it would still weigh 902,000,000 lbs. making it STILL 145 times heavier than the Saturn V rockets. Do the math, based on the "information" about this craft it's physically impossible for it to actually be real.

    • wade

      yes and i do mean YES. i have been following this "thing" since 2010, the story that is. a Lot doesn't "add up" as to weight and measures, although most of my schooling was is Newtonian based Statics with some over lay into Dynamics, etc. it is mind boggling when someone puts the pencil to paper. yet on the morning of 10/11/11 , at 3:15am , i Did witness "something " that defied anything i have Ever seen are have knowledge of. it passed over me and was Very stealth and was a huge manta shape, about 200ft wide, at about 200ft altitude, at a speed of 35m.p.h. , it was almost at hover and, at the time , i thought it was going to land in the farm fields that the road divided. very strange . but back to this propulsion system and TR-3B , every time i right it Off, i then hear or read or run across Something to re-ignite my interests.

      • math101

        I am not sure what it may have been that you saw. I definetally believe that we are not alone on the universe, or even this galaxy. The statistical probability of us being the only intellagent life is just rediculous. And I wouldn't be a bit supprised if we have been visited. Contact probably hasn't been made simply because if a society is capable of interstellar travel, we would be like primative ants to them. Once again, I'm not sure what you saw, but I did want to point out that the propulsion system described in this story is physically and mathmatically impossible. Thanks for your reply.

        • bikedragon

          It has occurred to me too that if we are talking about interstellar beings then we have to consider that they may have no actual interest in our species at all. Our home planet may be a source of useful material but we may be just one of thousands of primitive humanoid species – boring, useless but maybe good to eat! The thing is we just don't know but I do laugh when people think that our governments have super-secret knowledge. They are not that bright. Can you imagine our hormone frenzied politicians trying to play power games with beings of great sophistication and history? Of course we are all left grasping at straws.

          I have seen a great number of the boomerang shaped craft flying in civilian airspace in SE London. They pop in and out of visibility as they tear through the sky. Why? Are we lighting them up with our localiser beams and microwave arrays? Do they want us to see them or do they even care? Is this all part of an earth based phenomenon all along? So many questions and so little tangible evidence.

    • HDThoreau

      You are missing a piece. It doesn't say the pressure exists before the plasma field is active. It's created as it's initiated. At an 89% reduction in gravity/mass, and therefore pressure, that's 27,500 atmospheres. This is an Einstein calc, not a Newtonian one.

  • Math101

    And the centripital force exerted on the ring would be 1,331,992,992,435 pounds!

  • Archlight

    So this hard ware is over 15 years in the making, we've penetrated a lot of air space with it and still have not deployed it to Iran or North Korea to adjust their attitude (to my knowledge). Makes me wonder…

  • ceo111

    I love Math 101's comment, " Do the math, based on the "information" about this craft it's physically impossible for it to actually be real." Compute the bumble-bee, fella.

    • Math 101

      As the link below will show you, it's due to a combination of standard aerodynamics and an unusual flapping pattern of the wings. The left and right sides move independant of eachother and they don't flap up and down. They actually flap front to back and do a flip at each end which generates a small vortex above the wings to provide lift. This was discovered with smoke in a wind tunnel, high speed cameras, and laser measurements. Please see the following page:

  • John Sholtes

    One just crashed off Okinawa
    UFO Blamed For Millions Of Dead Fish Off Okinawa

  • Phil Young

    Interesting, at 150 Kelvin you can't have mercury vapour at 250,000 atmosphere, it would be a solid at that pressure and temperature.
    In order for a plasma to exist at that pressure it would have to be at an extremely high temperature.

    Think about it, it's rather like saying steam at 150K and 250,000 atmospheres, it would be very dense ICE, not steam.

  • Tess Luh

    I built one of these over a weekend using bits of an old Erector set, a Chevy Vega and some vacuum tubes, My version can also time travel but it gets lousy gas mileage so I don’t use it much

  • t stott-sunn

    Saw one a few years ago and assumed it was a classified tr-3 craft. Recently received indirect confirmation from someone who said it made all the atomic clocks in his home go haywire.
    Interestingly, also saw a fleet of craft that were somewhat similar but much bigger and more luminous, graceful, and phantom-like.
    Thanks for your post!

  • MAC

    On March 31, 2013 at 3:30 AM my buddy and I saw four of them after coming home from a wedding reception in Muncie, IN. Needless to say some crazy thoughts went through my head. Before doing some research, I didn't want to tell anyone. Thought they would think I was crazy.

  • Becky

    Seen in Netcong NJ in 2002. It was traveling very slow and low, just above the treeline. We heard no sound. The aircraft was above a Mexican restaraunt, a pink building called the El Coyote. It was still light outside. We slowed our car as we peeked directly at its underbelly. Frightened, we drove 2 blocks away to our apartment. We paced around for a few minutes before grabbing our camera and running back on foot. It was gone.

  • Believer

    I saw one in Ireland in 2007 It moved very slowly above my home at night.

  • John .

    In the early nineties, this aircraft flew silently over my head while working midnights on a railroad in south central florida. I was amazed…I feel vindication knowing its becoming known. I told so many people, many thought I was full of it…lol lots

  • △G secret government

    △TR-3B=MHD-Flying object

  • robomont

    notice how the gov started putting restrictions on mercury in the 90s.
    they need it for the engines.the amount of mercury cant be that much as the guys above stated.probly a lb. or two.the trick is to turn it into plasma.this ionizes the craft.then the mfd drives the ion field.a flying neon bulb without the glass.or an inside out tv tube.thats why eg&g hires tv repairmen.

  • Johnny Why?

    Back on 97, one floated right over me. It was about 3am, and I was with another person. I was living near a gf course and also near the Tom Ridge airport in Erie PA. We saw 3 red lights coming over the horizon. I wasnt sure what I was looking at. As it came closer, I realized it was moving extremely slow, and totally quiet. My friend ran in the house. I was frozen with fear/excitement. I felt like I was being scanned. It passed over my head and continued on towards the airport. I got in my car and headed to the airport, but of course found nothing. I couldn’t sleep and was totally freaking out. When the sun came up, the sky was completely covered with Chem/Jet trails. I stopped talking about it, nobody believed me – I was a nutcase for a few days…

  • VOID

    I witnessed what I believe to be this craft with three friends in KY 3 years ago (2010). We were sitting outside im going to say around 3 am smoking cigarettes in a more rural area, when we noticed a red light in the sky. It had been there for probably 10 minutes. After realizing the one red light was there I went to state that there had never been a radio tower in that direction before thinking it was just some tower I hadnt noticed before. Not one second after i state this fact the craft silently began to move towards us. It was a clear night with a full bright moon. The craft approached and then flew overhead past the house we were staying in. It appeared to be cloaked somehow but the outline was easy to make. It left a "chemtrail" behind as it left that remained for some time. It appeared to be the size of two football fields. I did not get a look at the back of the object due to fear and shock but I only made out one red light that seemed to be on the tip of the triangle flying towards us.

    • Eeee

      That is crazy… I live in Fairmont, WV and in 09 this exzact thing happened to me… I saw this thing with a red light and said when the hell did they put a cell phone tower in the middle of the road… and it started following my car and hovering above it for 15 seconds then slowly changed directions and went the other way… although what i saw wasnt 200 yds wide… I would say roughly as big as a fighter jet… but other then that I havnt heard anyone else say they saw it or describe anything as close to what I saw as you have

  • nexus

    Look up Super Fluid, Super Conductivity….250,000 atmospheres, -260 C,50,000 rpm's This is consistant with the variation of properties that these phenomenon exhibit within these criteria.This machine is operational and has been for 2 decades at least.

  • Bored

    Hey! Save this baloney for the next Liars International Convention . . . held every Leap Yeaar in Xanadu.

  • HealthySkeptik

    Amazing that with all of these sightings, and when everyone has a camera on their phone, none of you can post any pictures!

    • Mike g

      So what does that fact lead you to believe……….that everyone who reports a sighting
      Of this thing is a liar?
      Or are you just expressing the irony of it?

    • guest

      Cameras on cell phones can't take photos of dark objects at night that are too far from their tiny flash leds.

      However a trained british observer did take a photo of the flying triangle trsiled by two known jets. It is widely available on the internet and was published by aviation week magazine which has broken many top secret aircraft stories in the past.

    • Be Strong

      If you would See one of These objects… I' ll Tell you: you would be too afraid and shocked to Take a picture of it, cause it's too Strange…

      I saw one with my Family in the early 90 s in Europe and had the possibility to Take a picture of it… But i Decided to Take no picture of it… I was too afraid. I think if i had taken pictures i would have Thrown them away… You Cannot talk about your sightings, cause everyone thinks you're a Liar and that you're Crazy… It' s really Strange, surreal, Freaky but also so Amazing and wonderful if you See one…

  • Scott

    Yep, it sure is strange that so many people claim they've seen it, yet no pictures. Unbelievable.

    • Mobius999

      I can't get the MOON to show up in a picture taken with my cellphone, and you expect an aircraft to show up? It's not enough light for the crappy collector used on mobile devices.

  • Sajith

    The Original Flying Technology is used by King SRI RAWANA. It’s the truth. even Hitler found the that technology from the ancient scripts taken from the temples.
    If the Spartan War is true The king SRI RAWANA & his legends should be true. Even according to the Ramayana Our Great King SRI RAWANA Use a flying ship called                

  • dick

    'My sources say the performance is limited only the stresses that the human pilots can endure. Which is a lot, really, considering along with the 89% reduction in mass, the G forces are also reduced by 89%.' Anyone with high school physics knows that the g force on the body has nothing to do with the mass of the aircraft and everything to do with the acceleration.

  • Timothy Johnson

    This is absolute hogwash! No such vehicle exists! Period! What is being described here would make sound and have emissions of at least some sort! Most all of the black triangle sightings are completely silent. Including mine. The one I saw was towing another. They fit together with a sliding motion and can configure themselves in many different ways.

    Tennessee – Two Triangles Seen – One in Tow 
    Published: 9:55 AM 5/11/2010
    Murfreesboro, Tennessee – 01-13-10
    On the night of January, 13, 2010, at approximately 10:20 PM, Me and my wife were sitting in our bedroom that looks out to the north and east.
    We have 2 infant twin boys and she was holding one and I the other. She was facing the windows, when all of a sudden she said, “What is that thing?”
    She got up and moved to the window and said, “Oh my God, what is that thing?”
    I thought she was looking at the neighbors’ and she said, “Come here.”
    I went to the window and could not believe my eyes. There was a huge, dark triangle that had red lights around it moving very slowly and quietly, just maybe about 50 feet about the houses next to us! Wow!
    Attached to it was another triangle of the same size that had no lights on, as if the lighted one was towing the other! It was amazing!
    In the distance was a small, red, pulsing light, very bright. By the time I got dressed and the alarm system turned off and ran outside, it was gone.
    I walked around the house looking into the very clear sky for a few minutes. I saw a white light approaching as if slowly following the triangles.
    As it passed directly overhead, I could see that it was a military fighter jet. It did not seem to be chasing it, but rather just watching from a distance.
    Thus was the most incredible thing I have ever seen!
    Murfreesboro, TN

  • Jon

    Where can I buy a RC scale model of this aircraft?

  • lasse

    Me and my older sister saw one of these back in 92, we were heading to a VCR rental store to pick up a movie on a Friday evening in September. 
    We pulled over to watch this spectacular aircraft as it hovered over a field to the right of the car. We were driving in the middle of the country side and it was just hovering across the field at tree top level while rotating slightly, dead silent but as large as a passenger plane, with pulsating and glowing orange red lights in each corner. After a couple of minuttes it hovered across the road over on the side we were parked. 
    it gained altitude slowly and suddenly took off at an incredible speed up and straight into the night sky, whilst not making a single sound.
    this was in 92 in the middle of nowhere in Denmark Northern Europe. What an american black project aircraft would have to do there in the middle of a field in Denmark on a septemper evening still baffles me as much as seeing it myself.

  • Buddy

    I saw triangle too here in NL 🙂 while normal air traffic was down thanks to the Ejfyallallakull (how you spell it?) volcano on Iceland 🙁 So that means a flying triangle can save humanity by flying through volcanic stuff. Go go triangles! I salute you . shalom

  • Robby

    I dont understand why its a secret project, when so many people are watching it fly over their heads…..???

  • tim

    OK, so we have a top secret flying project that’s been seen vertually all over the world, including Russia and Iran, and civilian population rather than keeping it on a maximum security base??… I say BS.

  • Saw it too...

    I have seen this once in Quebec Canada in the 90’s as well… with as many sightings as there are, there is something out there for real… what it is I have no idea.

  • Great goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff previous to and you're just extremely fantastic. Thethriftymason MF Developer Trees for Children Health-Tower

  • Ed O

    It was operational as far back as 1982. My wife and I watched it hover over our property in the middle of nowhere in Lake County CA. We were located at the edge of Travis Air Force base. It came from the North, hovered for 10 minutes or so and turned back North towards the base. There were no lights on it at all, it literally blocked out a third of the sky. It was like a floating aircraft carrier in size. Was about 1:30 am and we were wakened by the noise it created, which was like the low rumble of an earthquake….

  • Bmymrk

    This is bs.

    This does not exist.

    It's a cover explanation to explain away UFOs.

  • anonymous

    I saw this vehicle in Mammoth in 2006 almost directly across from Area 51. They line up pretty well. Now I know why.

  • Anonymous

    I worked for Rocketdyne…this article also states that the 3 maneuvering engines at the corners of the triangles are hydrogen/methane and oxygen rocket engines. I can tell you that we certainly have not developed silent rocket engines. They are louder than He double ll…this article is bullcaca!

  • It makes sense this vehicle is not weaponized… yet. The most bad as airplane Egbert,  the SR71 was also only a spy plane. I’m sure this will be weaponized or there are fighter versions of similar design. They need to just stop the foolishness and tell us the truth. If Reagan was right and am alien force is already with us,  WE NEED TO KNOW. If there is no alien force,  then it is our own governments tasty are harming us. 

  • Geoff

    The only thing suspended here in mid – air without rational explanation are the Laws of Physics. Course there is my two sons saw the craft described about 15 years ago at 3:00am in Loomis CA.

  • Scuttsie

    There are some really disturbing flaws in this article. Like "reduction in mass by 89%" – has anybody heard about the law of conservation of mass and energy? How about E=mc2? Reduction of these objects' mass by 89% would produce so much energy that I doubt the Earth would survive! What is probably meant is that their "effective weight" is reduced by 89% probably due to magnetic forces interacting with the Earth's magnetic field. Also, the effect of G-forces upon the craft occupants would be unaffected by "effective weight" reduction e.g. flying insects are very light but still make a big mess on windshields of cars travelling at 80 kph. What I can believe is that human occupants would be suspended within a clear fluid, say WD40, and constantly fed air via tubes. That has been postulated would counter massive G-forces as the fluid medium and anything suspended within it would all experience the acceleration together. This article has more logic flaws than the Empire State Building. Paul Scutts

  • victor

    If USA have something like this, why they even bother creating f-35. Too contradictory.

  • Scott

    Why would these insanely top secret and classified planes be hovering over cornfields, railroads, wedding receptions and Mexican restaurants in New Jersey?

  • Steven Kessler

    Saw this triangle shaped object while flying from Texas to California 10 years ago on a commercial flight. The object flew beneath the 737 I was on and bisected our flight path. There was no observable means of propulsion on the craft. Most of the people on my flight saw it….the flight attendant came to the fellow in front of me an looked out and saw it too. She went to the cockpit and spoke to the pilot. The pilot said to tell everybody that his story was he didn't see a thing; and would advise us all to say the same if asked. Nobody in my family believes my story even to this day….I will be happy to be called sane again when this project becomes public….if I live that long. But I must say; why are we spending all this money on moon landings again with the technology that is available now.

  • Aug

    I saw this object while driving on the 303 Highway near Phoenix in 2006. I noticed the vehicle ahead of me suddenly came to a stop in the middle of the highway that forced me to slam on my brakes. I thought there was an accident ahead in middle of the road wondering why all the cars Ahead of me all came to a stop. So I got out of my car to investigate but I was stunned with what I saw up above us, was this triangular shape object with lights at its ends, hovering quietly, swiftly and maneuvering at speed and turns where no rotary or fixed wing aircraft can. I also realized we were driving close to Luke Air base, which came to my conclusion that is one of our black programs craft. The similarity I read here is that this object is always sighted close to an Air Force base.

  • sean

    My unit saw the TR3-B during the Gulf War in 1991 while inside Iraq. Was the large one bigger then a football field. It passed slowly over our position and was completely silent was maybe 500 feet off the ground and I remember the hair on my forearm standing up like static electricity. When we returned to our FOB and were debriefed. We were all told that it never happened and we weren’t to talk about it. That response made me realize it was ours and they were not pleased that we had witnessed it.

  • Rey Greenwood

    Saw it fly down the runway at Atlanta Hartsfield about 1:30 am in August ( was out watching for the Persied meteor shower) late '90s. Totally silent, moving at normal airline speed. Had 5 boomerang shapes on bottom. One other witness. Knew it was man-made, kept quiet.Rey Greenwood

  • John H Brewer

    My son has seen this air craft over Gallipolis Ohio just last week at night

    • Im wondering if the US will EVER reveal the existence of this craft like they did with the sr-71 blackbird.
      The main reason I think they wont is because of the huge difference in propulsion technology, the sr-71 used petroleum based fuel like everything else, but the tr-3b's mode of propulsion is radically different.

  • Tom Ford

    Bullshit–Rockwell doesn't make engines

  • David

    As convincing as it may seem I still think this is a disinfo snowball effect in practice

  • ecb

    This article and associated comments make me think that maybe Stargate SG-1 was based on actual events.

  • rgm

    Just a standard flying wing. Been around for ages. Can travel slowly, and can, like a lot of aircraft, look like they are hovering when they are in fact moving.

  • Technology Submission -State of the Art / Novel Rotary-Turbo-InFlow Tech / Featured Development
Atypical InFlow Thermodynamic
Technology Proposal Submission
Novel Fueled Motor Engine Type


*State of the art Innovative concept Top system Higher efficient percent. 
Have similar system of the Aeolipile Heron Steam device from Alexandria 10-70 AD. -New Form-Function Motor-Engine Device. Next Step, Epic Design Change, Broken-Seal Revelation. -Desirable Power-Plant Innovation.


YouTube; * Atypical New • GEARTURBINE / Retrodynamic = DextroRPM VS LevoInFlow + Ying Yang Thrust Way Type – Non Waste Looses

    -This innovative concept consists of hull and core where are held all 8 bteps of the work-flow which make the concept functional. The core has several gears and turbines which are responsible for these 8 steps (5 of them are dedicated to the turbo stages). The first step is fuel compression, followed by 2 cold turbo levels. The fourth step is where the fuel starts burning – combustion stage, which creates thrust for the next, 5th step – thrust step, which provides power to the planetary gears and turbines and moves the system. This step is followed by two hot turbo steps and the circle is enclosed by the final 8th step – bigger turbine. All this motion in a retrodynamic circumstance effect, wich is plus higher RPM speed by self motion. The Reaction at front of the action.

    *8-X/Y Thermodynamic CYCLE – Way Steps:
1)1-Compression / bigger
2)2-Turbo 1 cold
3)2-Turbo 2 cold
4)2-Combustion – circular motion flames / opposites
5)2-Thrust – single turbo & planetary gears / ying yang
6)2-Turbo 2 hot
7)2-Turbo 1 hot
8)1-Turbine / bigger

    -With Retrodynamic Dextrogiro vs Levogiro Phenomenon Effect. / Rotor-RPM VS InFlow / front to front; “Collision-Interaction Type” – inflow vs blades-gear-move. Technical unique dynamic innovative motion mode. [Retrodynamic Reaction = When the inflow have more velocity the rotor have more RPM Acceleration, with high (XY Position) Momentum] Which the internal flow (and rotor) duplicate its speed, when activated being in a rotor (and inflow) with [inverse] opposite Turns. The Reaction at front of the action. A very strong Novel torque power concept.

    -Non waste parasitic looses for; friction, cooling, lubrication & combustion. 

    -Shape-Mass + Rotary-Motion = Inertia-Dynamic / Form-Function Wide [Flat] Cylindrical shape + positive dynamic rotary mass = continue Inertia positive tendency motion. Kinetic Rotating Mass.

-Combustion 2Two continue circular [Rockets] flames. [ying yang] opposite one to the other. – With 2TWO very long distance INFLOW [inside propulsion] CONDUITS. -4 TURBOS Rotary Total Thrust-Power Regeneration Power System. -Mechanical direct 2two [Small] Planetary Gears at polar position. -Like the Ying Yang Symbol/Concept. -Wide out the Rotor circumference were have much more lever [HIGH Torque] POWER THRUST. -No blade erosion by sand & very low heat target signature profile. -3 points of power thrust; 1-flow way, 2-gear, 3-turbine. *Patent; Dic. 1991 IMPI Mexico #197187 All Rights Reserved. Carlos Barrera.


    ·2-Imploturbocompressor; One Moving Part System Excellence Design – The InFlow Interaction comes from Macro-Flow and goes to Micro-Flow by Implossion – Only One Compression Step; Inflow, Compression and outflow at one simple circular dynamic motion Concept.

    *·“Excellence in Design” because is only one moving part. Only one unique compression step. Inflow and out flow at the same one system, This invention by its nature a logic and simple conception in the dynamics flow mechanics area. The invention is a wing made of one piece in a rotating motion, contained in a pair cavity system connected by implocavity, and interacting dynamically with a flow, that passes internally “Imploded” through its simple mechanism. This flow can be gas (air) or liquid (water). And have two diferents aplications, in two diferents form-function; this one can be received (using the dynamic flow passage, as a receiver). Or it can be generated (with a power plant, generating a propulsion).

    Presenting one of the many diferents examples, could specifically be this same invention applied in pair in every bar end, similar to what would be a turbine reaction or turbocompressor, and making the best profit of a exhaust gas dynamic flow, compressing a new air entrance and therefore falling into the technical field of the reaction turbines. This of course, considerating materials that are resistant to the high temperatures such as the ceramics ones. And furthermore this invention approaches more the combustion point and therefore also more to the gases expansion point, in order to search a higher expanding dynamic strength. It could, for example, be presented into an inter dynamic rotor system (aplication), supported internally and in a rotating system. And likewise being able to activate a new concept of dynamic turbine by pushing gearing, and likewise, creating a new technical field. Or can be in a more simple way by means of the system of this same invention applied to the bar end, but without a movement of interaction with the rotor, only the rotary dynamics in a static point for any type of mechanical work such as a dynamo in order to generate electricity through the dynamic strength of a flow when it is rotating at the moment it receives it, just like a pelton well do.

    And when the flow that is received and that is intended to be used at best, must no necessarily by a exhausting or rejection gas, but must be a dynamic passing gas or liquid flow with the only intention to count it or to measure it. This could be possible at the passing and interacting period when it passes inside its simple mechanism. This can be in any point of the flow trajectory.

    In case the flow that is received is a water falling by gravity, and a dynamo is placed on the rotary bar, the Imploturbocompressor can profit an be obtained by generating? electricity such as obtained by the pelton well, like I say before.

    Or only receive the liquid flow, in order to measure its passage with a counter placed on the bar, because when this flow passes through the simple mechanism of a rotating wing made of only one piece it interacts within the implocavities system. And this flow can be air wind, with the diference of can have an horizontal position, and have wind from all the sides and all the time. The aforementioned information about this invention refers to technical applications, such as a dynamic flow receiver. (whether being gas or liquid).

    Connecting the free end of the bar of this invention to a power plant (manual, electrical, mechanical, or combusting, etc…), there will be available a capacity and a position in order to generate the flow dynamics (or even better, a propulsion). This applied? to gas flows (air) or to liquid flow (water). This of course, considering the due rotating directions as well as the inclination, wings, curvature and the due dimensioning for every application of every technical field.

    With the appropriate power plant and the appropriate dimensioning and number of RPM this invention is also feasible to generate an atmospheric air propulsion and the autoprolpusion of an aircraft. Being an effective and very simple system that implodes and compresses the atmospheric air permits the creation of a new concept of propulsion for aircrafts, due to its simple mechanism and innovative nature. At the place of the aircraft were the system appears and the manner how the propulsion direction can be oriented with a vectorial flow (no lobster tail) with I call “yo-yo system” (middle cut (at the shell) to move, one side loose), guided and balanced is feasible to create a new concept of TOVL-vertical take-off landing, I wish good for a wild conditions. Because the exhaust propulsion can going out radial in all the 360 vectorial positions, going out direct all the time in all the vectors direction. With his rotor cover for an better furtive fly, like going down of a bridge for example.

    The “Imploturbocompressor”, is a good option to pump water, or a gas flow, and all kinds of pipes lines dynamic moves.

    Likewise, with the due form and dimensioning, and considering the liquid density and the due revolutions for this element there could be generated a propulsion (water) in order to move an aquatic ship, whether on surface or under water. Also can be a good option to pump liquid combustion for a rocket propulsion.

    Making a metaphoric comparison with the intention to expose it more clearly for a better comprehension of this innovative technical detail, it would be similar to the trajectory and motion of a dynamic flow compared with a rope (extended) that passes through the system would have now a knot (without obstructing the flow), so the complete way of the flow at the imploturbocompresor system have three direct ways and bettween make two diferents turns; direct way (entrance) – turn – direct way (implocavity) – turn – direct way (exit), all this in a circular move system.

    Its prudent to mention that the curves and the inclinations of the blades of a rotating wing made of this invention, is conferred by its shape and function a structural rigidity allowing it to conduct and alter appropriately the dynamic flow passing through its system.

    This invention are very versatile, can be applied and used for any kind of flow, whether as gas or as a liquid, received or be generating it.? And it has different technical fields, being applied in any circumstance where the intention is to obtain an profitable work, to modify on his imploflow system.

  • Laura P

    Finally, an answer to what myself, my husband and another couple saw while we were on vacation in Ft. Myers, Florida one evening in 1994. We were standing on the beach. It was about 11:30 p.m. and there was not a cloud in the sky. All four of us glanced up and saw a triangular shaped object block out the stars as it moved slowly over our heads. We were unable to determine how large it was or how high it was in the sky. There were no lights and there was no sound. We watched silently, unable to speak for several minutes as it moved on down the shoreline of Ft. Myers Beach. My husband and I have speculated for years as to what we saw. Today I am sure that it was related to a TR-3B.

  • Jeff

    Did you guys get this TR-3B info from “Ghostwriter’s” final transmission?

  • rob

    Me and 5 other boys saw this in early 90s flying over liverpool, Jackson co., west virginia. It was crazy. Went for camera, but no film. Came over ridge just above treeline. It moved really slow, made no noise whatsoever. Small lights on each edge, nothing real bright. I lived on top of hill, we watched it cruise, slow and noiseless, till it went out of sight over the next ridgeline. Few hundred yards away. We got to watch it for about 3 minutes. To this day I remember that event like yesterday.

  • A force good guy

    if ya see something in the air .. which color it is..

    ..or whatever: think always: hi this is how USA goverment does our job

    this according to the good guys like US Gen. Dwight David Eisenhower.

  • Secrets Revealed

    I personally know a pilot who has flown these. They are magnetic based and rely on extensive number crunching and monitoring of earth’s magnetic field to operate. They do not operate in the manner described here. They are not use for anything other than testing, as they have a number of drawbacks. They are slow. This is because there are minor fluctuation in the magnetic field that need to be compensated for in real time to provide smooth movement. The distance from the actual ship location for monitoring magnetic field is not far, so it can’t compensate too far ahead, which requires basically creeping along. Top speeds are under 100 mph even when flying through the same area twice, as the fluctuations are constant. This negative is enough to keep it from being of any real military use at this point. Another reason is the magnetic fields generated onboard cause quite a few other problems, the least of which is not the interference of weaponry and targeting systems, though this is evidently being conquered.

  • Jannis

    Is this what myself, and three others saw in the 90’s in Arkansas.
    I watched this for a long time in the area of Magnet Cove. I always felt that there was a connection with the craft and National Lead.
    After watching for an unknown time, I called them outside to see what I was looking at…..don’t know how long I watched before I
    called them outside… finally started moving and came to an angle to the right of us. it finally started moving and came to an angle to the right of us.
    Triangle with white light in front, several lights on the side.

  • Jason Kotolski

    Seen one in Stevens Point Wisconsin in 1996. I was driving down a back road and seen it coming straight towards me About a hundred feet off the ground just above the tree tops. I got out of my car when I seen it coming and it flew right over me. Moving at about 15 miles an hour and it didn’t make a sound. Each tip had what look like a blue swirling iridescent orb not yellow and one larger one in the center. The most amazing thing I had ever seen. Definitely thought it was military!

  • Df241

    This article has so much bs physics in it I want to punch my computer. First off, even if you were to able to disrupt gravity with the electromagnetic force (two completely different forces), how would that have any effect on mass????? You would feel weightless because GRAVITY is negated by 89% not the MASS which is always at a constant. THE SAME INSANE G FORCES STILL HAPPEN IN SPACE WHERE THE EFFECTS OF GRAVITY ARE NO WHERE NEAR THOSE ON EARTH!!!! What you’re saying is that if you were to get hit with a spacecraft in the absence of gravity, you would be fine. It’s the same concept. Even if you COULD change the mass, air resistance would be INSANE. Imagine trying to get a piece of paper to go fast. It doesn’t work. There is no evidence for this and the supposed methods of flight defy the laws of physics (quantum and classical).

    • Norms360

      Most sensible comment I’ve read so far!! Although a bit aggressive 🙂

      I haven’t personally seen anything like the TR-3B or anything else remotely similar. I do however, firmly believe (for many other reasons) that there is something out there that we cannot possibly understand, such as what people keep reporting as a possible TR-3B. But when an article implies that by reducing gravity by 89%, the human body can suddenly cope with insane acceleration/deceleration? Then to go and state it uses thrusters powered by Hydrogen but is silent in operation? C’mon, even if this craft uses technology far more advanced than we could possibly imagine, sticking 3 (current technology?) hydrogen burning thrusters at the corners of the triangle shaped body would not be silent!

      Almost makes it feel like reading any other part of this article is a load of bollocks too.

      I’ve enjoyed reading about peoples personal experiences though, thanks to everyone who has contributed!

  • cwtamigo

    april 02 2012 lexington ky
    went outside about midnight,was watching 3 helicopters flying above city.saw a triangle shaped craft gliding quitely above helicopters, coming above uk and heading toward glided directly over my home.clear sky,the moon was i watched it pass over i could see all 3 corners were slightly glowing in the shape of it was about to pass between me and moon i noticed that the center bottom was much darker than the sky behind it.a unnatural dark like it was being generated somehow.when it passed between me and the moon i could see a low profile dome shape on i watched it glided, still making no noise toward the airport.i have allways wanted to see a ufo.but as i watched this craft something told me aliens arent flying that.americans are.the craft being described here looks exactly like what i saw minus the round lights.

  • Richard Marqua


  • Dave Jennings

    In 2008 around 10 PM I was flying out of Phoenix Az. We were at cruising altitude and speed. A TR3B flew up from ground level straight up quickly. Then it easily crossed under our plans. I was astonished, I told the other passengers what I had just seen and they suggested that I have a drink
    It was triangular with a light in the center and each corner
    The altitude gain and speed had to take an enormous amount of energy. It looked effortless. ..

  • Miguel

    My 5 yr old daughter and I saw one of these fly over our house in Austin, TX on Thanksgiving 2014. It was around 8:30pm and it was completely silent as it glided about 40-50 mph and with an altitude of what seemed to be a few hundred feet off the ground. Speed was constant and there were no signs of propulsion systems (i.e. no thrusters or chem trails). It was triangular with very dim copper-brownish lights. No red lights. It seemed to be about 40-80 feet long. Hard to tell as it was so dark that depth perception was skewed. We both saw the exact same thing as I told her to draw a picture of it when we came inside and her picture was exactly what I saw. I’m glad I have insight now about what it was because most people I tell just think I am crazy.

    • Oksanna

      I suppose someone here has already mentioned the book The Hunt for Zero Point by Nick Cook, a writer for Jane’s Military Publishing. It explains the history behind these craft, indirectly. Nazi technology continued by US government. Fascinating story.

  • Really loved this article!. Very educational. Thank you and I have now subscribed.

  • Matt

    The only issue I have with these claims about anti-gravity is that I am not completely sold on the idea of gravity in the first place. There is an interesting and growing body of work that is contradicting general relativity – mainly in the form of electrical engineering. In fact, the EE discipline could more reasonably explain these types of craft much more than the current (and probably false) understanding of physics.

    Everyone keeps using the word/term energy. Ask a physicist what energy is and they may give you a half-A#@ answer. But, we know what real energy is, it is they synthesis of both the magnetic and dielectric forces. Think about it, how can an atom violate the strong force by relieving itself of an electron? Even if that amount of time was one unit of Plank time (PT = 1 * 10 -44p), the mount of “energy” released would be much more significant than we observe. Isn’t it more reasonable that metals have a stronger dielectric field? Add magnetism, and bam, you have energy. The idea here is simple, not one person has ever observed the “flow” of an electron from one atom to another. Just have to connect the dots with what we see in the lab, and what we see in reality. My guess is that this is not a vehicle based on normal Newtonian physics. This is a vehicle based on electrical engineering, including plasmas and (here I go, over the deep end), the ether.

    I personally believe that the reason the science of modern electrical engineering is not flushed from these black projects is that it will prove that the assumptions we have about the universe will go down the toilet. Think about it, these craft violate many of the principles of modern physics (by modern I do not mean Newtonian physics). If the craft exists, then our current understanding of physics is wrong and undeniably disproven. What would this do to our society, the infrastructure we have built? The people that will have the hardest time with a disclosure event are the physicists. The electrical engineers will think it is Christmas morning! All of the standard models will be wrong. For a modern scientist, this is heresy. Fools.

    If we have built one of these vehicles, I am very proud of our government. Wow, shocking. They got their heads out of their A#$es and followed the science. Now we just need to get them to admit that Maxwell, Tesla, and likes were correct and that their simple algebra is correct. The funny thing is that the mathematics to make all of this work is so much simpler than all of the calculus crap used today (which goes against every principle of scientific discovery, KISS). Guys and gals, when this is disclosed finally, it will change the way you think about the universe, the galaxy, and the solar system. There may or may not be aliens/ETs/Sprits involved. Regardless, scientific understanding will change drastically.

    • Matt

      Sorry, the Plank time representation should have been (PT = 1 * 10^ -44). My bad!

      • Oksanna

        Thank you for an interesting post. On that day, that future day, ARP and the rest of the plasma cosmologists will emerge from decades of Newtonian enforced banishment. It is clear from Nick Cooks book Hunt for Zero Point, it works, but from the Nazis to the US, not clear why it works, I.e. under current science knowledge, it should not work.

  • Saw this at 3 am in Florida about 6 years ago …called Mufon….they subsequently denied any awareness of such a craft…..well kept secret…thanks for the video …now I know I am not a nut

  • Marcus

    I would like to advance a far more believeable hypothesis than the one above; this vehicle does not break physics – the tales around its technology and capabilites do AND deliberately so.
    What is it? My guess a very, very large near-lighter than air (NLTA) semi-dirigable (an airship in layman’s terms, but one that needs energy to stay up – not much energy). I think it developed from a class of large inflatable targets/ radar decoys developed by the US (Navy?) in the 1970s. Some bright spark (sic) added some kind of electrical lifting technolgy (electrostatic?)and got these things to fly in the air and then move (slowly). Add helium for neutral bouyancy – where has all the helium gone?
    But note radar target roots – simple radar targets are just tin foil and balsa corner reflectors. Modern ones are electronic pods that can make a torpedo look like an aircraft carrier or magnify a single aircraft into a squadron. So take a low and slow (and silent) flying aircraft that can mess with the minds of local radar operators. Add unconventional lights and a crew (optional?) and some some sophisticated IMINT and ELINT kit (so it has a purpose in life). Keep it all very secret. Now make a few of them. Pick a route across some dispersed populace and deploy several on the surface(corner of airbases, ship, submarine?). Fire up no 1 and fly slowly over first town. Make sure it is dark. When just going out of sight synchronize radar ‘zip’ and kill no 1 lights – igniting no 2 lights and radar position say 10 miles away at the exact same moment. Wow – that craft can travel at Mach 9 in an instant say observers. No it can’t. Repeat process until approach of daylight – land the craft, deflate, home for tea and buns. Wow, real ‘UFOs’ with witnesses, pictures, radar tracks and everything! Deploy on friendly territory until everyone knows ‘they’ are visiting ‘us’ with tech beyond our wildest capabilites then use same aircraft and tactics abroad – with those countries convinced the ‘Flying Triangles’ have “no defence significance” i.e. alien tech and there if f*** all they can do to match it.
    Why is it so large? Have you seen the size of a conventional airship in comparison to its gondola? It has to have sufficient lift to carry propulsion, people and useful kit.
    All just a wild theory – but less wild that most of the above.

  • Matt ash

    All true about the TR3B i am very proud of my fathers accomplishments.

  • from NC

    In my teen years I seen a black triangle screaming thru the sky broad daylight, it was low, in a straight line, no noise, no lights, no vapor trail, nothing! if I would have blinked I would have missed it, My girlfriend was with me at the time and did not see it so she thought I was nuts. I live right next to Cherry Point Air Station so seeing this was very out of the ordinary.

    -Everything I’ve read about this people say/seen it was just hovering. any info on it about that rate of travel?


  • I live in huntsville alabama. I saw one of these tb flying over my subdivision in broad daylight in 1999.

  • Wilson

    Saw one of these on the Eastern Shore of Maryland, I would have to say 2000-2002. It was in the evening, the sky was overcaast, and I was in my backyard piling wood for a bonfire. I don’t know why I happened to look up in the sky at that exact moment, but I saw a perfect black triangle fly slow and low, barely appearing as it passed between clouds. It was my obvious assessment that it was using the cloud cover as camouflage.

    It has taken me years to figure out what this craft was, but it could be none other than ‘Aurora’, due to its’ perfect triangle shape. I always had the feeling this was something man-made and not otherworldy.

    I have often wondered why it would be flying over my location, other than that it was headed to the Ocean, about 50 miles away. We have a local airport, 1-2 miles away, and I wonder if it would have had any contact with them, although I doubt it. This craft appeared to be so stealthy I would not be surprised if it was completely undetected by them.

    Thanks everyone for sharing their own stories!

Leave a Reply

sharethis_button(); }?>