Hillary Clinton refused yesterday to rule out a pre-emptive Israeli military strike on Iran. It was the first time that a senior member of the Obama Administration had openly discussed such a possibility.
The US Secretary Of State, speaking a few days before elections in Iran that will determine the fate of President Ahmadinejad, also warned that the country would face retaliation if it launched a nuclear attack on Israel.
As President Obama extends “an open hand”, seeking direct talks with Tehran in his attempt to halt its nuclear programme, Mrs Clinton appeared ready to unnerve the Iranian leadership with talk of a pre-emptive strike “the way that we did attack Iraq”. She said that she was trying to put herself in the shoes of the Iranian leadership, but added that Tehran “might have some other enemies that would do that [deliver a pre-emptive strike] to them”. It was a clear reference to Israel, where Binyamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister, has talked about the possibility of military action to halt Iran’s nuclear programme — something he views as a threat to the Jewish state.
Mrs Clinton, interviewed on the ABC program This Week a year after she conceded to Mr Obama in the Democratic primary race, said that it was US policy that a nuclear attack by Iran on Israel would be seen as an attack on the US.
“I don’t think there is any doubt in anyone’s mind that were Israel to suffer a nuclear attack by Iran, there would be retaliation,” she said, though she did not spell out who would retaliate. She was responding to a question about her statement as a presidential candidate last year, when she said Iran would “incur massive retaliation from the United States” if it attacked Israel.
Yesterday she said: “Part of what we have to make clear to the Iranians is that their pursuit of nuclear weapons will actually trigger greater insecurity.” She noted that Israel and Arab states were “deeply concerned about Iran having nuclear weapons”.
She added: “So, does Iran want to face a battery of nuclear countries?”
Similar Posts:
- U.S. Tells Iran: We Won’t Join Preemptive Strike
- Iran now Suggests it Might Launch Pre-emptive Strike
- Majority of Israeli Population Doesn’t Want War with Iran
- Iran Causes Strike Planning by U.S.
- Reported U.S. Iran Bi-Lateral Meeting Plans Denied
- Naval Armada Gathering in Gulf as Israel Prepares Iran Strike
- Israeli’s Back out of Promise to not Attack

The Guantanamo Prisoners Deemed too Dangerous to Release
U.S. and Russia’s Cyber Hotline
7-11 Implicated in Human Trafficking
Kerry Insisted on Attacking Syria….But
Another Miracle Attributed to John Paul II
How, Why…. I can barely read this
Leaked Documents Expose Canada as Spying on G20 Attendees
Hidden Report: How Iran Dodges Nuclear Watchdogs
Another Nazi Collared in Hungary
Hamas Force Policing Gaza to Stop Rocket Fire Into Israel
Putin: Syrian Rebels who Eat Human Flesh Should not be Armed
China Demanding NSA Surveillance Explanation
Canadian Mayor Arrested for Corruption
Syrians Training in Iran to Storm Israel
Bloomberg Refers to NYPD as “His Army”
Content of Calls and Emails Stored and Listened to on the Fly
Your Cell Phone: Obama Alerts You Can’t Turn Off
Latest Outstanding Waste of Money for Pentagon Toys
It would seem more wise to halt Israels insane intentions of attacking anyone…we all have to live in far of WW3 becasue of the irrational existential fear of a bunch of neoconzionists that i view as the worst thing to ever happen to the Jewish people.. then we have Hillery and all her puppet friends care more about the fate of Israel then they do the country they are supposed to serve..but yeah yeah we all know its all about the money powers and the bankers and the bastards in power..its all about their agenda…to hell with who they kill no matter how innocent…..Despicable A holes the whole bunch of them..complete psychopaths